| Winter 2006 CARES Foundation, Inc. | |
| Back to Winter 2006 Index | |
|
Is Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia Screening Worth It? | |
|
| |
|
by Katherine Kirk, RN, MSN | |
|
|
||||
|
Screening for Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH) due to
21-hydroxylase deficiency, the most common form of CAH, started in Oklahoma on
Valentine’s Day 2005. I was the state’s Coordinator for CAH, a new position, and
I was trying desperately to ensure everything was prepared for the first
newborns in Oklahoma to be identified at risk for this life-threatening disorder
through screening.
The page came at 8 a.m. as I was making my way to the office. Only eleven days
after launching the Oklahoma newborn screening program for CAH, the first
preliminary abnormal screen had been identified. The result was pre-released as
a panic value warranting immediate follow-up. Further testing was underway on
the newborn’s specimen, but the result was too critical to wait for the results
of the second screening test. I wrote down the name Aidan, and hurried to
contact the reported primary care doctor about the abnormal screen result. The Oklahoma State Department of Health (OSDH) achieved this milestone for Aidan and other Oklahoma newborns after six years of planning and promotion. The Board of Health (BOH) approved adding CAH to the newborn screening panel after an adequate funding stream was achieved, a requirement of the Oklahoma law that governs newborn screening. In addition to funding obstacles, screening for CAH stirred controversy in the state’s pediatric endocrinology community. The medical community anticipated countless hours ruling out large numbers of false positives, particularly in premature infants. Some also questioned whether newborn screening for CAH was really necessary. For example, females screen results that do not have CAH (i.e., false positives).
|
||||
|
These false positives are most often associated with prematurity. It is known that premature infants have elevated levels of 17-OHP (CAH screening involves detecting elevated levels of 17-OHP). However, a diagnostic workup must be done on each abnormal screen result because premature infants might also have CAH. To address this and the concerns of the medical community, the OSDH implemented a two-tierscreening test. The first test, measuring the 17-OHP level, is done by the Public Health Laboratory. If the first test is abnormal, then thenewborn’s specimen is sent to the Mayo Laboratories in Minnesota for a second test. Mayo performs a steroid profile to assist in determining those infants at risk for CAH versus those with elevated 17-OHP values related to |
![]() |
|||
|
other conditions, such as prematurity. This second-tier test reportedly will
dramatically reduce the number of newborns that must undergo further testing for
CAH. This is done by utilizing a steroid profile ratio to determine those
newborns at risk for CAH. It is thought that false positives are decreased by
70% to 80%. Oklahoma is the second state to use this new technology for CAH
screening. Now the time had arrived to act and as the OSDH Coordinator for CAH, I had the responsibility to ensure Aidan received the needed health care services to ensure a timely diagnosis and treatment if needed. When the pediatrician was contacted, Aidan and his mother happened to be in the office waiting to see the doctor.
Despite some medical complications in the first few days of life, he appeared to be a resilient newborn with few outward signs of the potentially fatal path for which his genes were coded. Aidan’s doctor understood the gravity of the screening results and acted promptly.
Only five hours had elapsed from that 8:00 a.m.
page until Aidan’s arrival at the OU Children’s’ Physicians Diabetes Center. His
My next responsibility to Aidan is to provide care
coordination services to ensure his health care needs are met. This long-term
follow-up program is unique when compared to other state screening programs.
Over the next few years, assessment of the CAH screening program will require
the painstaking gathering of data and the meticulous analysis of cost/benefit
ratios and outcome measures assessing health benefits of screening and long term
follow-up care coordination services. From a funding standpoint, the scientific
data will be critical in determining the program’s success. From the human
standpoint, Aidan benefited immediately from the expanded newborn screening
program. He will also benefit from the long term follow-up services that will
facilitate access to needed services to achieve optimal health throughout
childhood. For me, there’s no question of the program’s success. I am privileged to work with Oklahoma’s newborns identified with an abnormal screen for CAH, whether the condition is confirmed or a false positive. After all, what is the value of a human life? This first and unforgettable experience remains foremost in my mind as I consider the question. I have only to look at the face of this bright-eyed little baby and his devoted mother and the answer is clear. |
||||
|
Katherine Kirk is a CARES support group leader and the Endocrine Long Term Follow-up Nurse for CAH in the Oklahoma State Department of Health. |
||||
| Home | ||||
|
|
||||
|
© 2006 CARES Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of CARES content, including by framing or similar means, is prohibited without the prior written consent of CARES. |
||||